Horse? Zebra? Kudu? A true rider is not limited by species.

Submitted by: glass_dreamer via Submission Page
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous The Leprechaun Poor House | Parking Spot WIN Next »
Horse? Zebra? Kudu? A true rider is not limited by species.

Submitted by: glass_dreamer via Submission Page
am I the only one who thinks his legs are backwards?
No, I noticed that, too.
yeah, leave the legs black and this would be perfect.
This, of course, would be a zebra crossing.
“Extreme Equestrian: Horse? Zebra? Kudu? A true rider is not limited by species.”
the word equestrian only refers to horses, from the latin root “equus”, meaning “horse.” a true rider would know this and would still be limited by species. an ignorant person would not notice and laugh at this.
and no, i dont ride horses or shit, i just take latin in school. :/
Zebras are in the genus Equus, so you can still be an equestrian on a zebra. But it would not be easy.
@hello – for someone who knows Latin, you don’t do much research. Horses AND zebras both reside in Genus Eqqus, along with donkeys and Onagers. Therefore anyone riding a zebra is also an equestrian.
I suggest a biology class along with that Latin.
ok, I’ll go with the whole ‘zebra riding’ thing, I’ve seen ‘Racing Stripes’ (on the shelf at the supermarket that is).
But what would you call someone who wanted to ride a Kudu? Other than ambitious of course. What with a Kudu being a huge antelope and all that.
look Ma, no legs!